Welcome toChina Workflow Management Network
About us | Add to Favorites | 中文版
Whose fault is this?
From;    Author:Stand originally


F company decides to carry out ERP management software, give G advisory company is done carry out square. On plan design, develop or do not develop, f company and G company appeared difference. Because train of thought is differ,pay reach the attrition later to arise ceaselessly, relation of bilateral development staff begins insecurity to rise. Later, because the project leaves of pivotal personnel again and again, the good will of project of F company ERP is attacked so that smash in reality...

Comment on a person

Research center of management of AMT- company natural resources is advanced and advisory Wu Lianyin

Chinese electron Information Industry develops an academy (Saidiji is round)Liu QuanDoctor

Case setting

A good start

The iteration that passes a few months is compared, choose, argumentation, the ERP that F company decides to company of a large-scale software of executive abroad is offerred runs software, give the G that home has actual strength quite seeks advice from a company to do carry out square.

As F company equipment of tool of this large scale computer makes the CIO of the enterprise, OldThe gentleman can loosen eventually at a heat. Of the leader support energetically, software of foreign famous ERP, actual strength carries out a company strong, the computer standard of company staff is relative taller, these all looking, carried out a good head to ERP.

Very fast, g company foundation contract, the group came by seniorAdviser plumThe project that the gentleman heads implements a group, the project begins to carry out. Carry out to cooperate a project, f company also established ERP project group, besides the executive staff with original computer department, still transferred to be familiar with financial, cent to sell from business section, personnel of production a few business. Most begin, bilateral project personnel blends still calculate pretty good, analysis of survey, demand, crucial user grooms, one pace plans afoot according to the project. See so great progress, OldThe gentleman can'ts help the mind on happy event, he puts word with project group even: Strive for before ERP software the end of the year on line.

Develop or do not develop?

Before long, the project has plan design phase. F company manager decided tune to carry out before ERP carries out: Existing business flow cannot change greatly, can optimize stage by stage only. F company business is relatively complex, remain to improve the business flow with the standard many, reckon development amount is not small. Because this adviser is before discussion solution of branch of Wu of a person of same business, adopted following answering politic: Groom the client is familiar with systematic function as soon as possible, persuade a client to use a system already some similar functions, reduce a few meaningless development, the function that does not have to the system considers to develop.
Previous12 Next

Previous:Among the solution is transverse comment
Next:no article
Disclaimer:The only purpose of the site is to deliver more information. This dose not mean that the site will agree with the views and be responsible for its authenticity.